LIVORNO on NEW HOSPITAL: NEW HOSPITAL AND SURROUNDING L 'Urban Transformation Centre - Livorno Livorno
October 28, 2009
NEW HOSPITAL AND SURROUNDING
The choice of a new hospital block in place Mondolfi Street, not contained in the current Plan, it seems really unacceptable in substance and in method.
should not have any sense of the ridiculous to assert that the relocation of the hospital Leghorn "We are very well in the current plan" who happens does not provide for the movement of the hospital.
That said, we believe that we can agree with the views expressed by the union FIALS as reported by local newspapers in recent days:
"No ruling to a new hospital, but we take strong defects of democracy and planning."
The proposed "new hospital" is a further demonstration of the inability to exit the cage of self-administration parties and their representatives, and is a very bad example of government of the territory.
Two elements that arouse irritation in the sensitivity of responsible citizens: the underestimation of the participation and lack of transparency in decisions regarding changes in zoning and land.
We should demand accountability to the region of what is stated on the card on one of the general objectives of the regional health plan 2008-2010, (which also did not provide for a new hospital located in Livorno), which is to encourage citizen participation and involvement of professionals in the implementation of the plan.
In fact, the Regional Law No. 69 12.27.2007 "Regulations on the promotion of participation in the formulation of regional policies and local, is reduced to paper.
emphasize also that the town of Livorno has not signed away in its June 6, 2008 memorandum of understanding which insists on:
that the involvement of citizens and residents to the elaboration of public policies;
values \u200b\u200bof conciliation and confrontation as a method of governance in relations with local authorities.
We believe it is quite clear that the "new hospital" and the abandonment of the change of use for hospital and healthcare facilities existing or to be considered for the city and beyond, a major project with potential significant impacts environmental, territorial, social and economic, and therefore seems very serious to the ease with which we attribute to the overall planning process in anticipation of relocation assistance.
We also believe that it is clear that can not be considered exhausted with the participation of local newspapers published interviews with decision-making bodies (Regional Councillor, Mayor, Director of ASL) in October and from which it is clear that decisions had already been taken also in the elements of detail. So much so that
October 16 we learned that the economic and financial feasibility report had been prepared by a law firm, Pettinelli study, based in Milan, Rome, Venice, which had also made an economic assessment of all properties owned public alienable and on cost "correct" for the new structure of € 238,446,000, or € 220,538,229 (source of the Tyrrhenian Sea on October 25.
We are, therefore, presumably, in this situation a few months before the Sept. 30, the Director of ASL has hired a professional firm in charge of drafting of economic and financial feasibility, giving indications about the location of the new site, providing (within reason), at least a preliminary draft on which to base the assessment of costs and establishes guidelines for disposal of almost all the seats up the social health system Livorno, all at 'unknown and citizens and the entire city council.
The mayor tells us that the debate on the new site was developed "in a more or less Karst, "that is translated into Italian, in a" more or less "underground: this is the new participatory politics of City of Livorno.
to the merits of an issue as important as the structure of the health of our city, indeed it is not clear which model the organization and what content they have in mind the Mayor and the Director of ASL 6. The new system is entirely focused on the hospital without surgery, presidium, advisory neighborhood or area? And the new structure, as conceived? With the same today or departments with a new set of general and specialist medicine? It seems to us that very few
Leghorn in recent years have expressed dissatisfaction with the architecture of the old hospital, rather complain about the slowness of the emergency room, lack of rehabilitation departments, the absence of a hyperbaric chamber, the long waiting lists, and so on.
Moreover, the current area is so vast and under-utilized to enable the building blocks, plates, or what you want to build towers. In addition, central and easily accessible by public transport, a condition very difficult to achieve in the proposal Mondolfi Street.
Convinced that there is participation without the timely and accurate information, which can not be delegated exclusively to the local press, there still seems to be and proper to ask some questions and clear answers could serve to initiate a comprehensive comparison less "karst" in which the city can express their desires, needs and expectations of participation in civil and social life.
The City Council decided on the location before or after the award of the report to the study Pettinelli? The ASL when and from what direction institutional body had information on the location, size of the new health facility and the resulting changes in the current urban fabric?
As has been tasked by a public body at the law firm? With a fiduciary officer or by public tender? How much did it cost?
Who gave the assignment, and who, to draw the preliminary draft of the new hospital?
How can I deal with the new planning instrument, anticipating a change so substantial buoyancy citizen who invests directly in suburban area of \u200b\u200b25 hectares, without considering the neighboring areas and urban areas as stressed by the current site and the entire hospital existing social network health?
The new planning instrument has already been given? Who? The framers, complacent, they must simply accept the choices made outside of any planning and land planning generally?
Evaluations economic study carried out by Pettinelli to dispose of the buildings (most of the social health system Livorno) take into account the target stay in public service buildings or used otherwise in private, not covered by the current planning instrument? Because frankly if the old structures will be permitted in various applications, the estimate of € 300 per sqm seems really underestimated.
have been well evaluated the overall costs and the necessary resources for the implementation of the urbanization of the area, especially regarding the purchase of land and structures, estimated to be around 14 million €? O
following the proven method should yield another part of the city not to declare bankruptcy?
The sixteen hundred parking spaces require a transport model mainly to cover private public service lacking?
How do you reconcile the development of local services, basic social and health assistance, with the planned sale of most of the existing network? The costs for new buildings have been assessed? In
waltz numbers and directions as it has gone from under 650 beds, set September 30 to October 24 487?
The tool provides guidance to existing urban roads which take account of the landscape with an underpass at the top of the hill and under the railway and the old Aurelia. Not it is considered detrimental to a new bridge connecting the area Banditella? It is not enough, the lesson of the bridge of the Coral?
One last question: is it possible in this city to address problems of such magnitude and such a common interest through a process that is transparent way, the time and responsibility in decision-making and in which locations are planned and implemented real- participation of those who inhabit this city?
)
