regularly validated also the contest of Super Enalotto No. 143 Tuesday, November 30. The scheme is identical to that of the competition 136 (€ 88 cost, 176 shares), endorsements are as follows: Series 5846BME from 143039 to 143082. Good evening
Monday, November 29, 2010
Honda Odessey Blu Prints
Pools No. 98 to Sunday, 11.28 : 1 Published twelve from 75 € the Scommessona today
regularly validated also the contest of Super Enalotto No. 143 Tuesday, November 30. The scheme is identical to that of the competition 136 (€ 88 cost, 176 shares), endorsements are as follows: Series 5846BME from 143039 to 143082. Good evening
regularly validated also the contest of Super Enalotto No. 143 Tuesday, November 30. The scheme is identical to that of the competition 136 (€ 88 cost, 176 shares), endorsements are as follows: Series 5846BME from 143039 to 143082. Good evening
Saturday, November 27, 2010
Little Toy Trains Christmas Song Susan
Today Pools (Jackpot) and Super Scommessona Ena 142: only 2 "One Star" (retrieved 20 €) Published
Posted Pools (202 shares) and Scommessona (60 units). 
Posted Pools (202 shares) and Scommessona (60 units).
Metalcore Clothing Brands
Posted Pools (146 shares) and Scommessona (60 units). Regularly validated, also, the competition Super Enalotto No. 142 tonight. The scheme is identical to that of the competition 136 (€ 88 cost, 176 shares), endorsements are as follows: Series 5846BME from 1420226 to 1420269. Good evening
Friday, November 26, 2010
Thursday, November 25, 2010
How To Build A Ski Doo
regularly validated, also, the competition Super Enalotto No. 141 tonight. The scheme is identical to that of the competition 136 (€ 88 cost, 176 shares), endorsements are as follows: Series 5846BME from 1410169 to 1410212. Good evening
Wednesday, November 24, 2010
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
El Desnudo De Pati Manterola
Posted Pools (199 shares) and Scommessona (60 units). Regularly validated, also, the competition Super Enalotto No. 140 tonight. The scheme is identical to that of the competition 136 (€ 88 cost, 176 shares), endorsements are as follows: Series 5846BME from 1400159 to 1400202. Good evening
Sunday, November 21, 2010
Saturday, November 20, 2010
Cervix Low Hard Could Still Be Pregnant
Posted Pools (184 shares) and Scommessona (Saturdays and Sundays, 60 shares). Regularly validated, also, the competition Super Enalotto No. 139 tonight. The scheme is identical to that of the competition 136 (€ 88 cost, 176 shares), endorsements are as follows: Series 5846BME from 1390220 to 1390263. Good evening
Friday, November 19, 2010
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Groin Lump After Cardiac Catheratization
Because of schedules also lacking today Scommessona adjourned. Regularly validated, however, the competition Super Enalotto No. 138 tonight. The scheme is identical to that of the competition 136 (€ 88 cost, 176 shares), endorsements are as follows: Series 5846BME from 138,081 to 1,380,124. Good evening
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
Sunday, November 14, 2010
Autocad Sand Rail Blueprints
About baseless claims and language of Daniel Bertelli
About of baseless claims and language
Rossanda Rossana speaks well of desire: ".. the desire is not a dream, is lucid comparison between us and what lies ahead, and the relationships we have built around us, it feeds the desire not to accept , for a change. "(Il Manifesto, May 30, 2010)
I often hear the desire to change the relationships in everyday life, politics and a desire that moves primarily from the need to be geared towards the authenticity, not burdened by suspicion and envy, and out of the logic of rigid sides. For this reason I do not like the language used by the Committee of No, as I read the pages of the Tyrrhenian Sea on 13 November. Language "warrior", all based on the logic of emergency, on the assumption that those who do not agree on the location of the new hospital to give information as unfounded and that there are vultures (i Piombinese) ready to take advantage of the difficulties and "snatch" resources.
And speaking of resources, I would point out that nobody gives funding, and that the region simply anticipate a figure of 130 million euro, the ASL6 must return through the sale of most assets, which is public and therefore all / and us.
".. The agreement defines the relationships and coordinated actions between the parties to ensure the participation of all stakeholders in the program interventions to achieve the new hospital in town Montenero and related infrastructure works (the adaptation of existing roads, the establishment of adequate roundabouts and junctions, bus lanes, bicycle paths with disabilities). The total cost of the new hospital will be € 266,892,000, of which 185,413,000 payable by the company 6 of Livorno, and 81,479,000 from private resources (project financing). The cost of the adjustment of infrastructure projects amounts to € 15 million .. "(from the site of the Region of Tuscany)
The official acts of the bodies seem to speak of such sale, no formal act speaks of their fate should be" valued " that is becoming attractive for the market, as well as the market should be asked to invest around EUR 80 million in service management (having, as is natural, economic return).
and of these, and more, that on many occasions, such as Monitoring urban transformation, we have information, and I do not seem to be baseless claims, unless you tell us that what is written in official documents has no basis . It would be serious.
Council, indeed, those who want to be informed, to obtain and read the program agreement signed between the different agencies May 24, 2010.
We have never expressed opposition to the construction of new hospitals, we argued the reasons that lead us to give an adverse opinion on the location of the new hospital, urban planning reasons, firstly, the preservation of common goods in the training method of choice. You can, of course, disagree on our views, but where is the injury from us? I also think that an Administration request to plan major operations in a serious and participatory planning is not only appropriate, but also a duty, if our gaze is not limited to the here and now.
Daniela Bertelli
November 13, 2010 
SI
About of baseless claims and language
Rossanda Rossana speaks well of desire: ".. the desire is not a dream, is lucid comparison between us and what lies ahead, and the relationships we have built around us, it feeds the desire not to accept , for a change. "(Il Manifesto, May 30, 2010)
I often hear the desire to change the relationships in everyday life, politics and a desire that moves primarily from the need to be geared towards the authenticity, not burdened by suspicion and envy, and out of the logic of rigid sides. For this reason I do not like the language used by the Committee of No, as I read the pages of the Tyrrhenian Sea on 13 November. Language "warrior", all based on the logic of emergency, on the assumption that those who do not agree on the location of the new hospital to give information as unfounded and that there are vultures (i Piombinese) ready to take advantage of the difficulties and "snatch" resources.
And speaking of resources, I would point out that nobody gives funding, and that the region simply anticipate a figure of 130 million euro, the ASL6 must return through the sale of most assets, which is public and therefore all / and us.
".. The agreement defines the relationships and coordinated actions between the parties to ensure the participation of all stakeholders in the program interventions to achieve the new hospital in town Montenero and related infrastructure works (the adaptation of existing roads, the establishment of adequate roundabouts and junctions, bus lanes, bicycle paths with disabilities). The total cost of the new hospital will be € 266,892,000, of which 185,413,000 payable by the company 6 of Livorno, and 81,479,000 from private resources (project financing). The cost of the adjustment of infrastructure projects amounts to € 15 million .. "(from the site of the Region of Tuscany)
The official acts of the bodies seem to speak of such sale, no formal act speaks of their fate should be" valued " that is becoming attractive for the market, as well as the market should be asked to invest around EUR 80 million in service management (having, as is natural, economic return).
and of these, and more, that on many occasions, such as Monitoring urban transformation, we have information, and I do not seem to be baseless claims, unless you tell us that what is written in official documents has no basis . It would be serious.
Council, indeed, those who want to be informed, to obtain and read the program agreement signed between the different agencies May 24, 2010.
We have never expressed opposition to the construction of new hospitals, we argued the reasons that lead us to give an adverse opinion on the location of the new hospital, urban planning reasons, firstly, the preservation of common goods in the training method of choice. You can, of course, disagree on our views, but where is the injury from us? I also think that an Administration request to plan major operations in a serious and participatory planning is not only appropriate, but also a duty, if our gaze is not limited to the here and now.
Daniela Bertelli
November 13, 2010
Monday, November 8, 2010
Is Mgi Photsuite Roxio Now
SI hospital again in Viale Alfieri Daria Beech
new hospital in Viale Alfieri.
agree with the Director of the Tyrrhenian Sea: it is true, we approach the referendum date in a worrying climate of distraction. But the local press was more distracted than once, since among other things, has missed the conference on architecture imported hospital, held recently in Livorno to Lem.
On this occasion the order of the architects of Livorno, the city has made available, speakers really competent and well documented reports, to explain how the hospitals should be designed.
It was repeatedly stated that the hospitals are imported and so central to the life of a territory, to make it an indispensable work of careful planning, entrusted to architects and urban planners.
Mayor and Aldermen were invited but were absent.
Yet the conference was regarded as a wonderful opportunity, because it is measured with the most interesting cases and the most important achievements of national and international were considered the latest proposals for health care organization, designed by architects like Le Corbusier (new hospital in Venice) Renzo Piano, and others.
It 'been documented everything that should have been done (and that Livorno was not done!)
Allow me to clarify some issues on the sidelines I'm afraid that has not been well understood in our city. The new hospital
provided in Montenero, as well as what had previously been designed to Viale Alfieri (see project Mariotti) structures were conceived as intensive care, which provides very short stays. But unlike in Viale Alfieri Montenero was also provided for an adequate response to the problem of an aging population and the increasingly frequent and debilitating chronic diseases, not just the block for acute illnesses.
was in fact provided the pavilion for the rehabilitation and three for the low intensity of treatment to be obtained in the refurbished old hospital (with 200 more beds in addition to 450).
It also challenged the decision with a dangerous misunderstanding of the alleged best usability absolute structure of a device.
As has been explained very well in the conference, any relocation should be implemented only after adequate planning studies: the ideal is to find a well-centered in the municipal and provincial levels of users, an area located on the main axes of communication open at all directions.
E 'also need to have a lot of ground in surplus for future adaptations and extensions.
seems quite obvious even to laymen that Montenero meets these guidelines, since it is a hilly area not absolutely central, poorly served by an inadequate road network and very delicate in terms of hydrological risks. Regardless
the fact that there is twice as expensive than planned new hospital in Viale Alfieri, much better then the current target of the current PRG.
In conclusion it seems clear that the lack of discussion and participation is first and foremost blame the local government; open an open space in order to compare the different positions and we must stop with this annoying communication between deaf, not very exciting.
Daria Beech
Observatory territorial planning - Livorno Livorno
November 5, 2010 
new hospital in Viale Alfieri.
agree with the Director of the Tyrrhenian Sea: it is true, we approach the referendum date in a worrying climate of distraction. But the local press was more distracted than once, since among other things, has missed the conference on architecture imported hospital, held recently in Livorno to Lem.
On this occasion the order of the architects of Livorno, the city has made available, speakers really competent and well documented reports, to explain how the hospitals should be designed.
It was repeatedly stated that the hospitals are imported and so central to the life of a territory, to make it an indispensable work of careful planning, entrusted to architects and urban planners.
Mayor and Aldermen were invited but were absent.
Yet the conference was regarded as a wonderful opportunity, because it is measured with the most interesting cases and the most important achievements of national and international were considered the latest proposals for health care organization, designed by architects like Le Corbusier (new hospital in Venice) Renzo Piano, and others.
It 'been documented everything that should have been done (and that Livorno was not done!)
Allow me to clarify some issues on the sidelines I'm afraid that has not been well understood in our city. The new hospital
provided in Montenero, as well as what had previously been designed to Viale Alfieri (see project Mariotti) structures were conceived as intensive care, which provides very short stays. But unlike in Viale Alfieri Montenero was also provided for an adequate response to the problem of an aging population and the increasingly frequent and debilitating chronic diseases, not just the block for acute illnesses.
was in fact provided the pavilion for the rehabilitation and three for the low intensity of treatment to be obtained in the refurbished old hospital (with 200 more beds in addition to 450).
It also challenged the decision with a dangerous misunderstanding of the alleged best usability absolute structure of a device.
As has been explained very well in the conference, any relocation should be implemented only after adequate planning studies: the ideal is to find a well-centered in the municipal and provincial levels of users, an area located on the main axes of communication open at all directions.
E 'also need to have a lot of ground in surplus for future adaptations and extensions.
seems quite obvious even to laymen that Montenero meets these guidelines, since it is a hilly area not absolutely central, poorly served by an inadequate road network and very delicate in terms of hydrological risks. Regardless
the fact that there is twice as expensive than planned new hospital in Viale Alfieri, much better then the current target of the current PRG.
In conclusion it seems clear that the lack of discussion and participation is first and foremost blame the local government; open an open space in order to compare the different positions and we must stop with this annoying communication between deaf, not very exciting.
Daria Beech
Observatory territorial planning - Livorno Livorno
November 5, 2010
Tylenol And Constipation In Infant
ON THE REFERENDUM ON THE LOCATION OF A NEW HOSPITAL break the silence SI
ON REFERENDUM FOR THE LOCATION OF A NEW HOSPITAL
break the silence
We must first thank you for reminding the Tyrrhenian to the referendum, imminent, as to when unusual but necessary for citizen participation.
not want to go now in the controversy about the meaning or repeal the advisory referendum question, I emphasize only that the wording of that question is clearly related to a desire for repeal (You want to repeal the resolution ....?), But I want to stress that the referendum does not is no direct way to determine whether or not it is necessary to build a new hospital, any attempt to give meaning to this referendum is dishonest and completely unrelated to the debate that has developed (more or less "karst" say the Mayor) around the subject.
The open question now is, synthesis, only this: it is correct and justified urbanistically commit and cover with asphalt and cement twenty hectares of foothills (Montenero bottom) and change the intended use more than ten hectares of the central areas (the current hospital site) and most of the buildings currently on a regional network of health, in addition to the eight acres of valuable Rodocanacchi villa in Monterotondo, in contrast to the existing urban planning and in the absence of a new planning instrument general?
We, as a corollary, adding that the best part of town planning today tends not to consume land, to recover and qualify the city any, groped to meet the needs of a population decline, to preserve and develop public spaces and services in existence. It is also wrong
turn the referendum into a clash between parties, which also exists but that most citizens do not believe that Livorno interests at this stage, flattening the debate on the statements of this or that municipal council or party leader.
s compare the data and documents.
The agreement signed by all the agencies and institutions concerned states "that to complete the restructuring process in order to reach the standard required by the laws of the state sector and regional level. ... Would require a additional financial commitment of around 66 million euro, as evidenced by the specific interventions of the General Plan 2008-2010 drafted by the USL 6 and approved by the Director General Determination No. 952 of 14.11.2008 "
ie the so-called "Mariotti plan" would have made a new hospital to its present location without destroying the new structures built in the last ten years they have been already spent 70 million €. For the new hospital to serve instead Montenero at least 267 million more than fifteen million for roads, more than twenty acres of public land assessed insufficiently, € 25 million, throwing to the wind resources used up to now existing structure. We have this money? No, 6 to 40 million, USL will have a loan for 137 million will have to sell most of its buildings and land and 81.5 million will have to rely on private resources to be adequately remunerated, the cost of land will be compensated by demolishing Pastures and renovating the existing two old wards in hospitals. And why
for a USL, which includes the entire province and a hospital in the provincial interest at least were not interested in the other municipalities of the province and the charges are only paid by people from Livorno? Who should this?
architect Leonardo Bertelli
Livorno
ON REFERENDUM FOR THE LOCATION OF A NEW HOSPITAL
break the silence
We must first thank you for reminding the Tyrrhenian to the referendum, imminent, as to when unusual but necessary for citizen participation.
not want to go now in the controversy about the meaning or repeal the advisory referendum question, I emphasize only that the wording of that question is clearly related to a desire for repeal (You want to repeal the resolution ....?), But I want to stress that the referendum does not is no direct way to determine whether or not it is necessary to build a new hospital, any attempt to give meaning to this referendum is dishonest and completely unrelated to the debate that has developed (more or less "karst" say the Mayor) around the subject.
The open question now is, synthesis, only this: it is correct and justified urbanistically commit and cover with asphalt and cement twenty hectares of foothills (Montenero bottom) and change the intended use more than ten hectares of the central areas (the current hospital site) and most of the buildings currently on a regional network of health, in addition to the eight acres of valuable Rodocanacchi villa in Monterotondo, in contrast to the existing urban planning and in the absence of a new planning instrument general?
We, as a corollary, adding that the best part of town planning today tends not to consume land, to recover and qualify the city any, groped to meet the needs of a population decline, to preserve and develop public spaces and services in existence. It is also wrong
turn the referendum into a clash between parties, which also exists but that most citizens do not believe that Livorno interests at this stage, flattening the debate on the statements of this or that municipal council or party leader.
s compare the data and documents.
The agreement signed by all the agencies and institutions concerned states "that to complete the restructuring process in order to reach the standard required by the laws of the state sector and regional level. ... Would require a additional financial commitment of around 66 million euro, as evidenced by the specific interventions of the General Plan 2008-2010 drafted by the USL 6 and approved by the Director General Determination No. 952 of 14.11.2008 "
ie the so-called "Mariotti plan" would have made a new hospital to its present location without destroying the new structures built in the last ten years they have been already spent 70 million €. For the new hospital to serve instead Montenero at least 267 million more than fifteen million for roads, more than twenty acres of public land assessed insufficiently, € 25 million, throwing to the wind resources used up to now existing structure. We have this money? No, 6 to 40 million, USL will have a loan for 137 million will have to sell most of its buildings and land and 81.5 million will have to rely on private resources to be adequately remunerated, the cost of land will be compensated by demolishing Pastures and renovating the existing two old wards in hospitals. And why
for a USL, which includes the entire province and a hospital in the provincial interest at least were not interested in the other municipalities of the province and the charges are only paid by people from Livorno? Who should this?
architect Leonardo Bertelli
Livorno
November 7, 2010 
Saturday, November 6, 2010
Hard Wax Brazilian Mississauga
new hospital in Viale Alfieri Daria Beech
MONITORING URBAN TRANSFORMATIONS
Livorno Viale Alfieri SI hospital again.
agree with the Director of the Tyrrhenian Sea: it is true, we approach the referendum date in a worrying climate of distraction. But the local press was more distracted than once, since among other things, has missed the conference on architecture imported hospital, held recently in Livorno to Lem.
On this occasion the order of the architects of Livorno, the city has made available, speakers really competent and well documented reports, to explain how the hospitals should be designed. It was reiterated
several times that the hospitals are imported and so central to the life of a territory, to make it an indispensable work of careful planning, entrusted to architects and urban planners.
Mayor and Aldermen were invited but were absent.
Yet the conference was regarded as a wonderful opportunity, because it is measured with the most interesting cases and the most important achievements of national and international were considered the latest proposals for health care organization, designed by architects like Le Corbusier (new hospital in Venice) Renzo Piano, and others.
It 'been documented everything that should have been done (and that Livorno was not done!)
Allow me to clarify some issues on the sidelines I'm afraid that has not been well understood in our city. The new hospital is expected to
Montenero, as well as what had previously been designed to Viale Alfieri (see Mariotti project) are designed as intensive care facilities, providing for very short stays. But unlike in Viale Alfieri Montenero was also provided for an adequate response to the problem of an aging population and the increasingly frequent and debilitating chronic diseases, not just the block for acute illnesses.
was in fact provided the pavilion for the rehabilitation and three for the low intensity of treatment to be obtained renovated in the old hospital (with 200 more beds in addition to 450).
It also challenged the decision with a dangerous misunderstanding of the alleged absolute best usability of a device structure.
As has been explained very well in the conference, any relocation should be implemented only after adequate planning studies: the ideal is to find a well-centered in the municipal and provincial levels of users, an area located on the main axes of communication open at all directions.
E 'also need to have a lot of ground in surplus for future adaptations and extensions.
seems quite obvious even to laymen that Montenero meets these guidelines, since absolutely not a hilly area of \u200b\u200bcentral, poorly served by an inadequate road network and very delicate in terms of hydrological risks.
Apart from the fact that there is twice as expensive than planned new hospital in Viale Alfieri, much better then the current target of the current PRG.
In conclusion it seems clear that the lack of discussion and participation is first and foremost blame the local government; open an open space in order to compare the different positions and we must stop with this annoying communication between deaf, not very exciting.
Daria Beech
Observatory territorial planning - Livorno Livorno
November 5, 2010 
MONITORING URBAN TRANSFORMATIONS
Livorno Viale Alfieri SI hospital again.
agree with the Director of the Tyrrhenian Sea: it is true, we approach the referendum date in a worrying climate of distraction. But the local press was more distracted than once, since among other things, has missed the conference on architecture imported hospital, held recently in Livorno to Lem.
On this occasion the order of the architects of Livorno, the city has made available, speakers really competent and well documented reports, to explain how the hospitals should be designed. It was reiterated
several times that the hospitals are imported and so central to the life of a territory, to make it an indispensable work of careful planning, entrusted to architects and urban planners.
Mayor and Aldermen were invited but were absent.
Yet the conference was regarded as a wonderful opportunity, because it is measured with the most interesting cases and the most important achievements of national and international were considered the latest proposals for health care organization, designed by architects like Le Corbusier (new hospital in Venice) Renzo Piano, and others.
It 'been documented everything that should have been done (and that Livorno was not done!)
Allow me to clarify some issues on the sidelines I'm afraid that has not been well understood in our city. The new hospital is expected to
Montenero, as well as what had previously been designed to Viale Alfieri (see Mariotti project) are designed as intensive care facilities, providing for very short stays. But unlike in Viale Alfieri Montenero was also provided for an adequate response to the problem of an aging population and the increasingly frequent and debilitating chronic diseases, not just the block for acute illnesses.
was in fact provided the pavilion for the rehabilitation and three for the low intensity of treatment to be obtained renovated in the old hospital (with 200 more beds in addition to 450).
It also challenged the decision with a dangerous misunderstanding of the alleged absolute best usability of a device structure.
As has been explained very well in the conference, any relocation should be implemented only after adequate planning studies: the ideal is to find a well-centered in the municipal and provincial levels of users, an area located on the main axes of communication open at all directions.
E 'also need to have a lot of ground in surplus for future adaptations and extensions.
seems quite obvious even to laymen that Montenero meets these guidelines, since absolutely not a hilly area of \u200b\u200bcentral, poorly served by an inadequate road network and very delicate in terms of hydrological risks.
Apart from the fact that there is twice as expensive than planned new hospital in Viale Alfieri, much better then the current target of the current PRG.
In conclusion it seems clear that the lack of discussion and participation is first and foremost blame the local government; open an open space in order to compare the different positions and we must stop with this annoying communication between deaf, not very exciting.
Daria Beech
Observatory territorial planning - Livorno Livorno
November 5, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)