Exposed on New Hospital in Livorno February 11, 2010 Reflections on the hospital the President of the Regional Council of Tuscany, Claudio Martini
the President of the Province of Livorno George Kutufà '
pc
alderman to the Government of the Territory to the Councillor Richard Conti
Health Enrico Rossi
Al Mayor of Livorno, Alessandro Cosimi
At the Court of the Republic of Livorno.
the Ombudsman of the City of Livorno
regional communication
The Guarantor The Guarantor The Guarantor provincial communication
municipal communication
We explained that underwriters el''osservatorio urban transformation of Livorno made up of professionals and other people in various ways, however competent and bearers of experiences, cultures and sensitivity to issues of territorial governance of the city and its evolution, convinced all / I need to retrieve the values \u200b\u200bof the planning of public interest through the more Broad participation in the processes of urban transformation, considered unacceptable in principle in the practice and method, the choice of relocation of the Hospital of Livorno. Therefore
mean by this complaint presented to the authorities to apply for suspension of the acts referred to them by the serious weak point in the planning legislation beyond any critical assessment of the choices of government land.
E 'was used to practice outside of any existing rule, rule that each case requires different procedures than those taken casually. It is, in fact, a variant of the PRG decided the city without the detour required a formal adoption of the initiative of convening a conference of services to check the adequacy of the bypass with provincial and territorial addresses regional, to be finally approved City Council, after the time established by law for comments from the public. We reiterate that the district hospital in a structural stresses in the current area of \u200b\u200bViale Alfieri, who instead becomes that this area of \u200b\u200bprocessing and intended use must be subject to special variant of the PS.
It should be noted in this regard, the recent ruling of the Constitutional Court (No. 340 of 16 December 2009 establishing that you can not automatically change the municipal urban planning, or derogate from the rules of regional and district plans to privatize (sell "and" value ") areas of public property and buildings.
For municipal plans, as we know, the zoning laws for regional specific content (what the plans must be laid down on such studies must be based, etc.). and assurance procedures (which allow for, inter alia, advertising choices and participation of citizens). Obviously variations to the plans must follow these rules. Arrange so that the inclusion of a building in terms of disposal can be automatically mean variant choices allow unfounded and non-transparent procedures.
The current planning instrument contains no provision to undertake a restructuring of health services or to dispose of the existing hospital.
We read in the documentary material and a proposal for the preparation of the Structure Plan that "the community health service is provided by the hospital, local health units and care services" .... And there is no trace in all parts of the PS and the planning rules a change in intention. Now in
Regional Law No. 1 of January 3, 2005 "Rules for the government of the territory" art. 53 says that "the structure plan sets out the strategic direction for the municipality" and therefore an indication of the strategic PS of Livorno, with regard to the health facility is not expected to change the current system.
Moreover it is worth pointing out that on an area of \u200b\u200brelevance which totals about 100,000 square meters. (10 ha.), Bordered to the east by Avenue V. Alfieri for more than 400 m. to the south with the way A. Gramsci for about 450 m., on the north by private property (along the Elm and the path of Meridiana) and the public park "Sandro Pertini", in the west to a small part with private property and mostly intended for an open area with public park not yet appropriated. This is a vast area from central and well served by public transport. The existing urban area in the tool is fully intended to "existing services", subject to the provisions of Article. 37 of the rules of the planning rules. Still
art. 53 it is said that the SP is the planning instrument for "the identification of invariants through the definitions ... ... criteria and disciplines ... ... for the definition of land use, including with regard to each of the units territorial. "
In this regard it is noted that since the requirements of PS binding, indicating a change without their follow statutory procedures highlights a serious breach
In fact, the area planned for new hospital area already to existing services (nursing homes), the estimates of substitution (and transfer to where?) for senior housing project in the hospital, were not supported by compelling data: in fact, missing reports evidencing compliance with the rules and cards provisions (persistent area of \u200b\u200blow Montenero) subsystem settlement of hills 4D (Article 18 Structure Plan NTA) UTOE D1 Montenero (art. 22 PS NTA). There are no detailed data about the size in terms of SLP to determine if it is compatible with respect to sub-4D.
But more importantly there seems to be the choice of a partial change of use in that area of \u200b\u200bViale Alfieri floor area to existing services, and falls nell'UTOE 4C4 (Viale Carducci - Station) subsystem 4C settlement of the plains, which would become a all intents and purposes an unexpected area of \u200b\u200burban transformation in addition to the 11 territorial unit under organic, each of which is regulated so vincolistico as shown in Annex 2.
If not, you configure the instrument in urban force for two different areas both in the hospital, with an illogical and unjustified oversizing of these uses, nor indeed would be possible to change the intended use del'attuale surreptitiously established nosocomial
This is equivalent to a real tsunami on estimates of binding rules and the invariant set out in PS, which also defines the possible increase of GFA of residence and other services and features list for the absolute and relative.
Please note that the 300 existing homes in Port Medici (not provided) as well as substantial increases in the residential area project in the new center, blew the roofs of estimates the plan currently in force.
whole, as we have tried to demonstrate through studies and critiques, and newspaper articles, the location for the new hospital involves restructuring the entire health and social services and welfare as well as a chain of replacements (demolition) reconstruction of Interest relevant parts of the city that they represent a true urban upheaval. Regional Law No. 1 / 2005 (Article 5 and Article 53 paragraph 1 and 2).
It seems quite clear that no serious research and study has been done on the effects, a chain that produces the new settlement on the balances of the general structure and infrastructure of the city, in stark contrast to the
Regional Law No. 1 / 2005 (Article 5 and Article 53 paragraph 1 and 2).
We quote from the text of Law No. 1, to highlight what we have so far said: "The Structure Plan outlines the strategy of territorial development - the minimum size of sustainable settlements and services necessary for basic organic units, systems and sub systems in compliance with the provincial and regional guidelines. All this is being challenged by the 'new hospital and the procedures taken to date. We also highlight that any agreement between the institutions (municipalities, regions, ASL 6) that does not include compliance with laws and regulations, local and general, in force is regarded as totally illegitimate.
Therefore we reiterate, as a substance dell'esposto, the need to take before proceeding to the choice of location for the new hospital, at least a variant of the PS and HR practices and following the rules laid down by the regional law in force.
