What To Expect Strabismus Surgery

Intervention Leonardo Bertelli (Monitoring Urban Transformations)

GOOD INTENTIONS

Since the beginning of October 2009, began a sort of comparison to the distance between the Mayor (and some councilors) and the dissenters on land use decisions that led to the location of the new hospital, while engaging in try to prevent the unfortunate choice, but I felt a kind of dissatisfaction, annoyance, in opposing positions so radically opposed to those with whom I shared ideas and battles in the past, people who also recently in the last phase election administration had seemed to me propose guidance of government away from what seemed to me desirable.
then I went to re-read what the mayor wrote in his electoral program:
"together to govern change ...., passed a hierarchical view ... idea of \u200b\u200bparticipation as an engine of change ..., citizens not only recipients of government actions, but actions themselves ... of government, participation evolves tool to build and maintain social ties, to reaffirm and defend a vision of the Community territory ...., Livorno city's participation "
" is over the building expansion of the city ... recovery of the motor as an autonomous center for Development of Livorno ..., the new identity will not be characterized by its residential expansion in non-urbanized areas or systems identified in environmental and / or agricultural ... "
and, in ten lines devoted to the new hospital, is not about relocation or alienation through exploitation of the majority of the assets dedicated to health, but a hospital as a terminal node of a network, as a pawn of an integrated and coordinated among the hospitals within the Area and the vast territory from Livorno.
But then, seeing the evolution of events as stated in the program was just a list of good intentions, not lines of government on which to direct its administrative action, not a kind of pact with the voters, but a container of ideas attractive to voters likely to be abandoned when no longer needed, mirrors larks!
But then the only defenders of the electoral program of the Mayor are the ones who were forced to promote and support the referendum against the location of the new hospital and who have made real and viable as it was in the program itself!
should reflect on all the political forces that support the action of this Municipality, and are likely to flatten out the intentions of the director general dell'ASL6, little concerned with the ripple effects that induce land use Leghorn such purposes, and that after the signing of the program, said the document "blind" these commitments, which implies the sale "enhanced" of all properties listed regardless of the intentions expressed by the Mayor on the future use of the buildings of the hospital site (poliambulatoriio, pavilions) or territorial structures (via the sea).
urge the City to make available the entire Agreement "sealed" on their site, in the meantime read on the website of the Region of Tuscany between the resolutions of the Board (Resolution No. 380 of 22.03.2010).

Leonardo Bertelli OTU

Aveeno Baby For Tattoos

Intervention Daniela Bertelli (Observatory of Urban Transformation) NEW

AT STAKE

The political and institutional events that led to the identification of the area to build a new hospital and the signature of the program contains a wealth of ideas reflection, both about the choices, and on possible ways of understanding the territorial government and participation.
the previously mentioned program agreement is referred to a technical paper and appreciation of the City Council of this document between July and December 2008 there were, then, for all time be open to a confrontation with the city choices and to link the revision of the Structure Plan. So it was not.
The convocation of the referendum, the municipal decision of location of the new hospital, the success of the collection of signatures are testimony to the desire of citizens and citizens not to be relegated to the role of mere spectators, and is a desire felt and expressed by men and women of different cultural and political orientation, which escapes the logic of institutional deployments. How
Observatory urban transformation, since October of last year, which is when the press began to appear some news, we have developed documents, put questions to another without receiving answers about the whole affair. Our opposition was not and is not ruling against a new hospital, but is primarily a critical way of practicing the "government" of the territory for "emergencies" later, without an overall plan, clearly and openly discussed. And we are very worried that create a unique work of public interest (the new hospital), make available, through the sale of a private market share of large public assets (buildings and areas). These buildings and those areas to be attractive to the private market, in fact, must be, to use the technical term "enhancement", ie have an economically attractive target for private investors, with inevitable consequences marginal land use in our city . And again the private market is called to intervene for nearly a third of the total cost of the new structure with the formula of project financing.
And then, as the network will consist of health services? What are the costs of a new organization? We have some indications emerged only in the City Council in March 2010 that, in some cases, seem to contradict what is acted out in the program. Some examples are: District via the South Zone of the Sea, is in the list of buildings to sell and value in the text of the program (Resolution Regional 3/22/2010), the City Council, also last March, is shown as future home of district activities; District Centre Zone: in the claims submitted to the City Council is located in the current clinic, which, however, for in the program is between the property to be sell and value.

Daniela Bertelli (Monitoring Urban Transformations)