ON REFERENDUM FOR THE LOCATION OF A NEW HOSPITAL
break the silence
We must first thank you for reminding the Tyrrhenian to the referendum, imminent, as to when unusual but necessary for citizen participation.
not want to go now in the controversy about the meaning or repeal the advisory referendum question, I emphasize only that the wording of that question is clearly related to a desire for repeal (You want to repeal the resolution ....?), But I want to stress that the referendum does not is no direct way to determine whether or not it is necessary to build a new hospital, any attempt to give meaning to this referendum is dishonest and completely unrelated to the debate that has developed (more or less "karst" say the Mayor) around the subject.
The open question now is, synthesis, only this: it is correct and justified urbanistically commit and cover with asphalt and cement twenty hectares of foothills (Montenero bottom) and change the intended use more than ten hectares of the central areas (the current hospital site) and most of the buildings currently on a regional network of health, in addition to the eight acres of valuable Rodocanacchi villa in Monterotondo, in contrast to the existing urban planning and in the absence of a new planning instrument general?
We, as a corollary, adding that the best part of town planning today tends not to consume land, to recover and qualify the city any, groped to meet the needs of a population decline, to preserve and develop public spaces and services in existence. It is also wrong
turn the referendum into a clash between parties, which also exists but that most citizens do not believe that Livorno interests at this stage, flattening the debate on the statements of this or that municipal council or party leader.
s compare the data and documents.
The agreement signed by all the agencies and institutions concerned states "that to complete the restructuring process in order to reach the standard required by the laws of the state sector and regional level. ... Would require a additional financial commitment of around 66 million euro, as evidenced by the specific interventions of the General Plan 2008-2010 drafted by the USL 6 and approved by the Director General Determination No. 952 of 14.11.2008 "
ie the so-called "Mariotti plan" would have made a new hospital to its present location without destroying the new structures built in the last ten years they have been already spent 70 million €. For the new hospital to serve instead Montenero at least 267 million more than fifteen million for roads, more than twenty acres of public land assessed insufficiently, € 25 million, throwing to the wind resources used up to now existing structure. We have this money? No, 6 to 40 million, USL will have a loan for 137 million will have to sell most of its buildings and land and 81.5 million will have to rely on private resources to be adequately remunerated, the cost of land will be compensated by demolishing Pastures and renovating the existing two old wards in hospitals. And why
for a USL, which includes the entire province and a hospital in the provincial interest at least were not interested in the other municipalities of the province and the charges are only paid by people from Livorno? Who should this?
architect Leonardo Bertelli
Livorno
November 7, 2010 
0 comments:
Post a Comment