After the referendum of November 28
You experience each / one of us have found, at least once, to confront someone, instead of sitting on the ground of the comparison, talk about anything else. So often we felt like Observatory urban transformation in recent months of debate on the location of the "new hospital". Exactly how OTU tracking spoke, criticizing the choice of area of \u200b\u200bMontenero low in substance and in the method for its detection.
We were and are still very concerned that we make choices in Livorno intervention on the urban fabric to the outside of a clear and participatory urban design. In the case of "New hospital" is not just a speech "heavy" in a delicate area of \u200b\u200bthe territory, among other things, with no guarantee of sufficient resources for road infrastructure, it is also jeopardize the future of land and buildings value, as the area of \u200b\u200bViale Alfieri and Rodocanacchi villa, which are available on the market is essential to recover some of the resources needed to build a new hospital. And it is a sale of assets, in order to be attractive on the market, will be "enhanced", that have a destination that makes the investment planning for individuals, "convenient".
We have some doubt about the fact that a transaction of this kind can be ascribed to ".. the concept of using public works such as handling the city's economy" (A. Cosimi: Speech on the results of the referendum).
Given these concerns, we were repeatedly told that the stakes are a more modern and effective health care, as if the quality of services depended almost exclusively within the container where you play as if those who oppose the location of the deliberate municipal administration did not care about the health and welfare of the inhabitants of this city.
Not so: we think it right to respond to a need there is only one thing, the one identified by the Administration and we also think that when taking decisions uploading of the characters in "emergency" is never an operation of long breath, able to look beyond the here and now.
We note with pleasure that the Mayor has recognized the need to identify new forms of participation. And yet, because of the difficulty of communication already registered, we should also make explicit the meaning that is attributed to the term participation. A
us some concern was raised when we heard from the Mayor an interpretation of the phenomenon of abstention as a "mandate to govern the problem the City Council: perhaps on the themes of the report rulers / ruled, elected / voters /, representative democracy / democracy real affection / disaffection vote would require a slightly more refined analysis. And yet another concern has arisen in us when, always the mayor, speaking of twenty thousand people who voted for a different location has stated that 'it is right and normal to have un'interlocuzione, trying to convince all .. "the goodness of the choice of Directors. But a comparison
fertile is not one in which a party convinces the other, but one where you have the ability to find a third way. This taught him the real professionals of participating, those who have knowledge and skills to operate as facilitators of participatory processes.
Monitoring Urban Transformations
0 comments:
Post a Comment